@Ingwer:
Omen ist eine abwertende Bezeichnng für das secundeisch-göttlich interpretierte "Fardayiriya".
Aber das Wort Omen (Vorzeichen, Vogelschau) bedeutet:
Der Mond, der Geist, der (Grab-)Stein, der Mensch, die Hand, die Mensis, der Monat, der richtige oder falsche Zeitpunkt usw.
Gespiegelt: Der Name, Nam-Tar = das Schicksal, Nemeton = Heiliger Bezirk usw.
"Part I [ sec 5] What is a fardār?
The Arabic term fardār is not a corruption of the Greek term for period as most presume;
it is rather a root (fard) word for ritual worship based upon calendar dates. This term carries a connotation to a religious ascription – as everything under Islam is considered religious rather than political. Since everything in astronomical/astrology of this type of method is perceived as some mathematical function where two separate system come together to give a single output ( influence on human affairs or natural occurrences)
all classifications of esoteria were mathematically based, which entails a purist definition of a function in mathematics. Nur mal so auf die Schnelle dem mathematischen Legastheniker Allrych ins Gesangsbuch geschrieben.
Was schrieb Gustav Friedrichs um 1910? "Die Geschichtszahlen der Alten sind Kalenderzahlen", nämlich Fardayriyas.
Abū Ma‘šar ( Revolution of the Years of Nativities ) and later Ibn Ezra ( Book of Nativities and Revolutions) who both explain profectory computations for mundane astrological charts assign periods of time to a classification system with an identifier which is a transitory ruler of the fardāyrīya. In the book Revolution of the Year of Nativities, Ma‘šar explains what would be similar today as constructing a solar-return astrological chart. These ideas are also found in the medieval age transliteration from the fifteenth century of one copy of Albumasaris de revolutionibus nativitatum.
From the solar –return coordinates, using the contemporary year in question is calculated including all relative angles for that year and then, Ma‘šar explains “[...] After that, write in the planets [,]tail [,] in their own houses and in the signs in which they were in the nativity. After this, write in the location of the ASC of the nativity and the place of the profection of the year from it, i.e. from that same ASC of the nativity [ this gives a longitudal-distance that is then used to calibrate a fardāyrīya]; then write in the location of the profection of the division and its ruler and its partner in the division, the ruler of the fardār; and the one that divides with it and the ruler of cycle –each of these in the sign and in the terms in which it is . And if in the radix of the nativity there was, in the ASC or in the angle of the MC or with either of the lights or with those of the seven planets which were in the angles, any of the fixed stars, write that one there.”[10]
Trithmvius frames his fardāyrīya based upon the ‘agent’ Mars and his reign ended in 1771 and would not come again until the thirty-fifth century A.C.E. But this mass extinction of humans based upon academic science of a superior race/culture/human physical commenced under the Age of the Moon, according to Tithemvius’ created system. But Tithemvius thesis is that Mars rules when global chaos commences in history. Troy was destroyed under its reign, so was the Jewish race first temple destroyed. Trithmvius’ argument then cannot be validated in light of recent historical research. But we need to consider that Trithmvius was neither an astronomer nor an astrologer and this probably explains his lackadaisical math. This was because this made-up system was not his thesis; it was the out of control warlords of the Early Modern Age of Europe, the out of control warlords of Asia and the out of control warlords of the Middle East. Rather than make this system applicable to the genre it concerns, all too a confusing mishmash of ideas and subjugated traditions forces us to deconstruct the origins of this said schema of time and to then reexamine if Nostradamus employs it at all!"
bookoflife.org/history/france/nostradamu..._3.htm#_Toc304804433
"Trithmvius’ argument then cannot be validated in light of recent historical research."
Warum? Weil die Geschichte vor 1600 durchgägnig konstruiert wurde, von A - Z. (Natürlich auch noch Teile danach)
Aber alle Fardayriyas führen uns zu 2016 bis 2018 oder 2235 bis 2244, denn dafür wurden sie letztendlich hergestellt, ohne die interessanten und wichtigen Zwischenphasen (=Geschichte) auszublenden.
