Dumm nur, dass die Autoren nicht anders als Fomenko die nachweisbare Geschichtlichkeit etwa ab 1200, mit einem Vorlauf ab etwa 1000 AD beginnen lassen. Genau wie ich, der ich auf ganz anderem Wege, nämlich komputistisch, zu diesem Ergebnis kam.
Ich kenne diese Seite seit langem und kenne natürlich das interessante Buch von Grishin.
Ich verweise in diesem Zusammenhang aber auf den sehr viel aussagekräftigeren Artikel von Dr. Yaroslav Kesler: "THE PERCEPTION OF OPEN-ENDED TIME", indem er, wie ich oder Marx, aber völlig unabhängig von uns, die kosmische Katastrophe um 1260 (Fiore) einführt und die daraus resultierende Geschichtsfälschung beschreibt.
Einige Zitate daraus:
"If one looks at the traditional dates enumerated above, then the oldest of them is 1260. This hardly is an accidental coincidence, as will be shown below."
What really happened in 1259/1260, actually, is known today to the one Lord God, but there is real physical and chemical evidence of the extraordinary NATURAL events of the time. The historians write that in expectation of the end of the world, people who had gone mad ran into the woods and committed suicide.
The traces of a catastrophic event are observed everywhere in the Arctic glacial core samples in the form of exceptionally powerful and keen (in the assessment of time) acidic and sulfate spikes in the investigation of samples of native ice which relate to this year. Over the course of 5,000 years before this, and also after this, up to now nothing of the kind has been noted.
The fact that nowhere are there any records about a specific, gigantic eruption of a volcano (and it clearly should have taken place in the inhabited part of the Ecumene), speaks of the fact that this had to be NOT a volcanic,
but an extraterrial event, that is, a catastrophe caused by an extraterrestrial source.
A catastrophe caused by an observed extraterrestrial source, was unable not to leave traces too in the mentality of mankind.
In particular, danger which occurs from the sky is the strongest religious motivation. In this connection a phenomenal occurrence of a prophecy is typical
Besonders wichtig ist diese Aussage:
When the witnesses to the catastrophe died out, the opinions of the descendants were divided: some considered that the coming of the Messiah had taken place, and they became Christians, others decided that the scale of the catastrophe was not that and they still had to await the Messiah - as the Orthodox Jews were educated. A third, the least literate, decided in general to do away with prophecy: they declared that the last of the prophets - Mohammed - will remain the last forever. But even subsequent generations continued to break off relations: Moslems split into Sunni and Shiite exactly on the grounds of prophecy, and part of the Christians preferred to have a permanently acting prophet in the person of the Roman Pope.
Und nicht zu vergessen, was ich bewiesen habe:
There simply was no term "Julian calendar" before the 16th century.
A shift by 1,000-(1,050) years is a creation of a "chiliastic" concept, finally adopted in the "15th" century
1050 Jahre sind genau die Differenz zwischen 532, der Einführung des XK durch Exiguus und 1582, der Einführung des GK. 1050ist ML oder Martin Luther.
www.revisedhistory.org/oet.htm