Bereits am 17. Juli 1944 hat sich in Chicago Bay (nordöstlich von San Franzisko, Kalifornien, USA) eine (erste?) Atombombenexplosion ereignet.deutsche Atombombe
Quelle: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Chicago_disaster#Nuclear_bomb_theoryThe Port Chicago explosion was studied by the Los Alamos National Laboratory team working on the Manhattan project. The resulting damage was seen as being similar to the effects of a relatively small nuclear explosion with destructive power equivalent to 2,000 tons of TNT. Paul Masters—a photo technician at Los Alamos—made copies of some of the study documents and stored them at his home. In 1980, Peter Vogel discovered one of Masters' documents in a rummage sale and noticed that one section of text read "Ball of fire mushroom out at 18,000 ft in typical Port Chicago fashion". Vogel—a New Mexican information officer-turned-journalist—began to research the possibility that the Port Chicago explosion was caused by a nuclear bomb. Beginning in 1982, Vogel publicly voiced his theory, raising a storm of controversy in the Bay Area press.
[...] After failing to find hard evidence to support his theory, Vogel abandoned it in 2005. Vogel's website was remounted in 2009 under a different.[sic]
Vogel's theory has not had any traction amongst mainstream historians. Nuclear historians Lawrence Badash and Richard G. Hewlett, in an article from 1993, took issue both with Vogel's alleged evidence of weapons effects residues as well as Vogel's proposed timetable for the production of the bomb itself."
At 10.18 pm on 17 July 1944 a 9000-lb nuclear bomb was set off
in Suisan Bay in Port Chicago, 35 miles northeast of San Francisco
and 70 miles southwest of Sacramento; 322 workers, trainmen, ship’s
crew, stevedores (ship loaders), sailors and marines were killed. Most of
them died instantly and most of those that died were Black (202). It was
the largest stateside disaster of WWII, yet no conclusions have been
reached as to its cause. (S. 209)
The US government did have the capability to produce several
nuclear weapons at the time of the Port Chicago explosion. It needed to
test them, was in a position to test them, and tested one in Port Chicago,
35 miles northeast of San Francisco.
Building Port Chicago began in June 1943 and at the time of the
explosion it was 80% complete. The first loading pier was ready for
use in May 1944, two months prior to the explosion. The reason given
for not finishing the pier was a shortage of manpower, yet after the
explosion the entire pier was rebuilt within a week. This suggests
prepreparation and a planned nuclear test with self-sabotage and cover
involved, quickly followed by a fully functioning unit. (S. 213)
Quelle: www.greghallett.com/pdf/Gifting%20the%20...osion-%2017.7.08.pdfAt Port Chicago, post-test caution was the same as for a nuclear
test elsewhere. The only pre-test caution not taken was to remove people
out of the area, but the test had to be done in an area where there were
other explosives so it could be blamed on chemical explosives.
[...]
As soon as the Port Chicago atomic bomb exploded, a team of Los Alamos
Laboratory scientists were at Port Chicago assessing it in record time.
This resulted in 400–600 pages of memoranda and reports citing parameters
and artefacts. (S. 215)
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
Hallett über Hoaxes:Scores of Nazis fled to South America after WWII.
Argentina opened its Nazi files on 30 January 1992 but none
of them were of Hitler. Hitler's file most likely kept under
presidential guard in Switzerland.
The British Public Record Office contains files under reference
number FO898/257 dealing with Swiss matters. It is on permanent
loan to the Foreign Office and is unlikely to be released in the
foreseeable future. (S. 158)
The "Spymaster" über Museumshistoriker:A hoax is always built upon a previous hoax
and never the truth of history.
This is how history is hidden and how history is formed. It is
also why 95% of all history books contain information that is
two-thirds false. The longest hoaxes are always reason for the
next war. (S. 377)
Hallett über Hugh Trevor-Roper:All the museum historians are picked solely for their
ability to swallow the bullshit from the officially embedded
historians as they die off. [...] In extreme cases museum
historians are left uninstructed and in highly secretive cases
are left without a museum. (S. 213)
Despite the strong indication that Hitler had escaped to
Barcelona, all search efforts were directed elsewhere.
To counter this, the British sent out a young army major and MI-6
agent, Hugh Trevor-Roper who was someone with no authority, but
breeding. He was 31 years old but looked 23. This is called 'send
a monkey, get peanuts'.(S. 373)
Hugh R. Trevor-Roper was a naïve intellectual who was easily
bluffed by his own employers. His employers, the upper crust of
British society and intelligence, gave him kudos, position and
status for recording their eloquent status quo of investigative lies.
[...]
He was British aristocracy and wrote their history with a handcuffed
pen.(S. 477)
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
Es gibt im moment ein sehr gutes Interview mit ihm:http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/.
Juli 27.
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
smurf schrieb:
Es gibt im moment ein sehr gutes Interview mit ihm:http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/.
Juli 27.
Ziemlich wichtiges Material dazu:
[...]
Dejenen die zuhören wollen werden erstaunt sein.
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
Danke für den Link.Es gibt im moment ein sehr gutes Interview mit ihm:http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/.
Juli 27.
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.
Bitte Anmelden um der Konversation beizutreten.